stupidity of stereotypes personal brand / blog guillemrecolons.com

#MarcaPersonal and stupidity of stereotypes

Valora is post

I understand sociologists. In fact, In Myself "CV error"I would not have opted for sociology as a university degree, especially knowing that devote more than 20 years advertising.

A favorite obsessions of this group of sociologists is to qualify in groups of behaviors or patterns similar behavior. It turns out that as born in 62 I'm now Baby Bommer, but my sister, that is the 64 it's generation X, and supposedly between her and I should have draft differences. My daughter is generation Z, and in between are the Millennials or Generation Y are now on everyone's lips because age is about to direct the destinies of mankind. Contradictory? Isn't it?, It is the stupidity of stereotypes.

tribes, groups, stereotypes

The idea behind it is to qualify, indeed, Common patterns are observed among different groups. And there are. For the purposes of advertising segmentation, an ad for a Apple Watch It is directed to early adopters, individuals who want to be the last of all and that some brands have also become fetishized. While an announcement of an investment fund in fixed income targets more conservative profiles.

Errors not take into account the personality

I realize that many of the test or quizz trying to qualify in a tribe begin asking age. Trap. What good would know what kind of stereotype about your way of thinking and acting, not your pure and simple demographic classification.

We also ask for your digital skills, which greatly facilitates segmentation, but can fail: my mother, with 76 and of the silent generation, not release the iPad and thanks to Facebook it keeps up all, but I know managers 45 who refuse to have a profile on Linkedin the use Whatsapp.

A common mistake is to consider that everyone is employed in a solid and stable company. Sirs! We live in a liquid economy, almost gaseous, where I am now here and gone tomorrow, in which we can work on several projects at once for several companies without belonging to its workforce (knowmads).

Another mistake is that they give as something normal that a person has written a the free ebook. Agree, new technologies make it easy for us all. But few people dare to write something that goes beyond his name, a mail agents a Whastapp?

Poor quality tests that only serve to capture naive

One of the problems that brings the digital revolution is the urgent need for the headlines, easy solutions and the need to please everyone with very viral elements that are shared on all social networks. And often there are tests that have not been adequately tested and that only deserve to appear in the tabloids (rose in Spain) by the banality of their results.

Yes, the stereotype kills me

Advertising friend and storyteller Richard Wakefield I could not have picked a better name for your blog: “the stereotype kills me”, a site recommended to improve our communication subscription and our brands. Stereotypes were needed and still are in many cases, but they do not consider something to defend the mortal death personal burners (another tribe): the uniqueness of each person, Permit me the anglicized his- uniqueness.

The six types of personal brand

A reputed author, speaker, and Tertullian called Bryan Kramer proposes a test (a quizz) to find out which of the six types of personal brand belong. As your website is not licensed Creative Commons (his loss) I can not reproduce any image. I will not even put a link.

Kramer classifies us into six types of subjects according to our personal brand:

Altruist

Altruistic. Altruistic individuals are recognized for their commitment to helping others. They are people who not only work for their own welfare but for their community.

Careerist

Trepas. The trepas or careerists are people focus on their career advancement above all else.

Early adopter

Those in the last. It refers to a subculture of progressives recognized individuals who embrace individuality above all. Usually the first to try new things and share them with others.

Boomerang

controversial. It refers to people whose brand is closely identified with the controversy.

Connector

connectors. They are people who pride themselves on their ability to bring people together. Usually well they connected and use their networks for networking. They usually have a creative profile, and obtain validation and satisfaction through others.

Selective

Selective. He is a person who shares information with specific people. Usually cures carefully the information based on the needs and interests of the audience it addresses. They value exclusivity and is seen as a reporter and generous person.

I happen altruistic

I have done the test and it is proposed that classifies me as altruistic. But I do not agree. Not because it is, but because my DNA is made up of small parts of each of these six types of personal brand.

In the same way, I am a late baby boomer, but I have a closest behaviors millennial in the use of the media and a generation X in the structure of my messages or how to feed and interact with my loved ones.

We are more than a stereotype

People do not shy away from stereotypes, but we belong to several.

Our mind is very complex, and as far, the mood and the person or group we have before we act and behave in different ways. This is not to say that there are no quality tests, as a good 360, A DISC ... but in most cases we answer more thinking about what we believe will give us a better rating than what we are really.

Because we are based in a thousand different circumstances. I remember when I worked at JWT, an advertising agency, I wondered if you would be willing to work abroad. It is a question that can never be dichotomous (yes or no), and I would have perhaps moved smoothly to New York, Rome or San Francisco but not to Azerbaijan.

Not all who vote right-wing parties are conservative and all who vote are progressive leftist parties, and certainly you know more than one person who wants to change the world but right rate options.

The demoscopy need to adapt to a more complex social profile, extraordinary, changing, liquid, capricious. Do not belong to a "Personal Brand" belong to all in context. Obsesionémosnos to work in depth our uniqueness, vigilemos with stupidity of stereotypes.

Groups image by shutterstock.com

About me Guillem Recolons

Convinced that everything leaves a mark, I help companies to better connect with their stakeholders through personal branding programs (personal brand management) and employee advocacy (internal brand ambassadors programs).

I collaborate with Ponte en Valor, Brandergizers, Soymimarca, MoreThanLaw, Noema Consulting, AdQualis and QUIFER Consultants.

As lecturer, I participate in the Graduate Social Media of UPF, ISDI, EMBA IESE, among other. Advertising man, Master en Marketing. Grade student of Humanities.

My DNA comes from advertising 20 years in agencies: BBDO, J.W.T., Bassat Ogilvy, Saatchi & Saatchi, Altraforma and TVLowCost among others.

Visita mi Website
See all my publications
15 replies
  1. Mertxe Pasamontes
    Mertxe Pasamontes says:

    Well explained Guillem. Humans are known us by our own personality that for some external ad hoc classification. That does not mean it does not influence us our sociocultural context, but in the context of our own personality, that filters what we receive that context. I also identify with several of these profiles personal brand. Without the test. A test to be reliable validation must have a very well done.

    Hug!

    Reply
    • Guillem Recolons
      Guillem Recolons says:

      Mertxe, it seems that today is too easy to classify, label, Group. Anyone with Excel can create a questionnaire-based garbage to generate patterns of behavior stereotypes are also not mutually exclusive. Thanks for your comment, expands and clarifies the idea of ​​post. A hug. I see you in a few days!

      Reply
  2. Paul Adan
    Paul Adan says:

    true Guillem, stereotypes in the liquid was no sense. I save the archetypes of Jung, They help us identify and propose strategies, although more storytelling tools that mirrors. Today your mirror is yourself, although it sounds like this sometimes something hollow and little Transcendental…. regards !

    Reply
    • Guillem Recolons
      Guillem Recolons says:

      true Pablo, and Jung differed very well between archetype (born of the subconscious) stereotype (created by collective). We are, as you say, mirrors of ourselves, and very rich in interpretations. A hug and thanks for writing!

      Reply
  3. Carlos Navarro
    Carlos Navarro says:

    Strongly agree with Guillem, in my opinion seems that nowadays if you vote “White”, and they labeled you as “White” to 100% without being able to have any nuance, now that elections approach.
    Every person is a world, Sort by a label it is as sorting products by barcode.
    In theory I belong to the millennials, Am I supposed to just have to have the characteristics that are associated with this generation?

    Definitely, the stereotype kills me, like the black sheep.

    Reply
  4. Marcos Pastocchi
    Marcos Pastocchi says:

    William. Recently I keep him, only a few months. I write, because I feel really identified with what it says, in most publications (I could not yet read them all). It is true that our stereotypes vary according to circumstances and are part of our social adaptability. And much more if we want to belong to a specific group. I also identify with a pinch of each of these six classifications of Kramer. And that fresh start to sow seed in my personal brand. In all I hesitancy, those things are not in control (as many). And it is when a headhunter, HR recruiter or head, I pigeonholed into a group, tribe or stereotype, not interested in personality, (I have found many and many do by the age variable) or start thinking about what we did not like yesterday, Today we like. Or that our adaptability and learning with technology and RRSS is much more than to expand our sense of belonging. And they see it as a desperate act, to stay in business. Few see or measure our attitudes, and I am among those who think they are the basis of our learning skills. Everyone hates being pigeonholed us, but ultimately, we seek to always improve what we do to change the position they pigeonholed us. And today the demand will be more altruistic profile in the era of corporate sustainability and tomorrow will be selective in a world much more 1×1. of equal,… but as little attitude today, changes much what we are. Or as Galeano: in the end, We are what we do to change what we are
    A greeting and I still want to continue following him.

    Reply
      • Marcos Pastocchi
        Marcos Pastocchi says:

        I think there you've given, although there is also a bit of luck on our destiny to be in place and the right time. But as we are responsible for our actions, ergo its consequences. Ultimately it all boils down to feed in good shape our personal brand (although later what later) , to attract customers and headhunters. Greetings and thanks for your advice.

        Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] Stupidity of stereotypes. June 2016 […]

  2. […] I know I do not enthuse stereotypes, but today I put you in the position to decide whether your brand belongs to the type cupcake, muffin o […]

  3. […] #MarcaPersonal and stupidity of stereotypes Published in June, the post is a personal manifest against the rigidity of stereotypes continuously used to define models person, and often exclusive, ie one can not be a % of one and one % of other, what pigeonholed irrationally. […]

  4. […] and indoor and left are university and coast: that's oversimplifying and stereotyping, in the end, all have the same right to […]

  5. […] many variables, I argue that attitude is the primary, but we can not deny that stereotypes of edadpueden be decisive. The question is has the same look of your CV […]

  6. […] many variables, I argue that attitude is the primary, but we can not deny that age stereotypes can be decisive. The question is has the same look of your CV one recruiter of […]

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  I agree with the Privacy Policy

Basic information on data protection

Head "William Recolons Argenter

Purpose »Management doubts and customer services

Legitimization "interested Consent

Rights "You have the right to access, correct and delete data, and other rights, as explained in the additional information

Additional information »You can see additional and detailed information on Personal Data Protection on my website guillemrecolons.com